2005-01-14 - kikai-yasha
Searching for my Happily Ever After.
Content: 28/40
Well, I must say the biggest detraction from your entries was that they fell so far and few between that most of the entries don't are too weirdly seperate to be interesting to me. There were interesting parts, and I really wanted you to keep into them, but then you'd go ten or twelve days without having an entry, and I'd know that you weren't going to finish the full thought and I lost desire to keep reading. I did like your new years resolutions, and how you had pictures and links from time to time. Those were interesting, I suppose. The two stats entries were pretty interesting, if not unconventional for an entry. Considering they were surveys, I wouldn't normally like to read them, but as there were two in a row (as your entries usually came), it was interesting to see what had cahnged from the first one. I really don't know that I enjoyed your entries all that much, but I think it has a lot more to do with the fact that you just don't update.
Literary style/Grammar: 6/10
Well, enough, but your litereary style was kind of drab. I dunno, I just didn't like it.
Layout: 13/15
The picture was just too wide for my liking. The writing and navigation and all fit, but the image doesn't. I do like it though, because you really like Doc Ock, and as long as the design fits the writer, I like it.
Contact: 3/5
Notes.
Extras: 5/5
Imood, Me, Rings, Extra, Wishlist.
Ethereality: 10/15
I must say, your passion for Doc Ock is definately unique. Not many people I know are so devoted as to even have a template with him! What else....Your previous and next links are unique too.
Will I return? 1/5
Nah, not my style.
Total: 71/100 --- C-
Additional comments:
Nadda.
Reviewed by: Valerie!
previous||next
Diary Reviews
<< last - random - list - next >>